In deference and respect to her ancestor, 241 years later,
this mysterious lady (5th generation ancestor of the Maestro) is
beginning to share even more of “The Sonata Diaries.”
Because he was working on a number of compositions in his
last years, specific to the Sonatas, she wants to share some from his diary on
Op.111.
Again, she is doing all this now, in an effort to imagine
Beethoven’s music as appropriate to all we face and live with now in the 21st
Century.
She did reveal, in a very short interview on March 24th
of this year, that she has fantasized how Beethoven may fair in modern recording
studios, with modern audiences; and just how this music would be received in a
world today that seems more interested in the fundamental dynamics of tunes
than the complexity of conflicting ideas stirring in the depths of the human
condition.
Beethoven states in the diary, “I was going through much
physical turmoil, but this was not unusual, as I was beleaguered with melodies
and notes. Op.111 (my serious musings with this work) began in 1819; however in
the summer of 1820, I was most consumed in it. I cannot say why, but at this
time I was hearing (reviewing my works
from the diaries of 1801) a theme from an earlier Sonata that was coming back
to haunt me. There was something in this
theme beckoning me to stretch it and work it in another manner.
I cannot say how it happened, but I was compelled to
introduce (in the 1st movement: Maestoso—Allegro con brio ed appassionato) a
set of variations on a 16 bar theme, but then something came over me to
experiment (which worked) with small notes, divide the bar in 36 resp. 27
parts. I know it would be difficult for other pianist’s to play, yet perhaps
they will just have to learn to boogie—woogie.
I so know this Sonata will be out of the ordinary, yet it
says so much from my experiences when I was out-of-my mind --- pushing the
limits of the breadth and scope of this instrument as well as even bending some
ears!
It (this Op.111) is also a statement that paints a picture of
the nightmarish realm of the underworld (the world of dreams) when sometimes a
benevolent “creature” can appear to offer grace. In retrospect, it is also a
piece that deals with my challenges of living with human and mortal flaws.
I am sorry that it is only two movements. I had so many
demands on my table and Schindler helped me all he could. I did “plan“ on three
movements, yet when I play it now, each movement sort of functions as an
opposite. The two together are providing
a balance of opposites--perhaps in the future, this “balance” will be an
underlying message that will come across when listening to my Op. 111.”